25-year-old dealer wins appeal after 33-month drug sentence

A German national convicted of dealing heroin and crack cocaine avoids deportation to Germany due to poor language skills, exposing chronic failures in removing 11,000 foreign prisoners amid rising appeals. This pattern persists across governments, prioritizing rights over public safety.

Share this article:

Saleh Hussein Hamid holds German citizenship. Yet a tribunal overturned his Home Office deportation after a 33-month sentence for dealing heroin, crack cocaine, and cannabis in West Yorkshire. Judges accepted his claim of insufficient German proficiency as a barrier to reintegration.

Hamid arrived in Britain as a child. His lawyers argued this severed ties to Germany, leaving him unable to communicate effectively there. They added risks of right-wing persecution and anti-Islamic bias in his homeland.

These claims prevailed despite his fluency in English during drug sales to undercover officers. Police caught him after a high-speed chase through red lights in Leeds, finding £300 cash and street-ready cannabis. He also admitted dangerous driving without insurance.

Foreign nationals fill 12% of English and Welsh prisons—11,000 inmates. Deportation rates for such offenders hover below 50%, with appeals like Hamid’s exploiting Article 8 human rights on family and private life. Tribunals prioritize individual circumstances over public protection.

Germany receives few such returns. In 2023, the UK deported just 342 German nationals total, many non-criminals. Hamid’s case joins precedents where EU citizens challenge removal post-Brexit via retained rights.

Home Offices across governments promise swift removals. Labour’s 2024 manifesto targeted foreign criminals; Tories ran similar pledges since 2010. Outcomes diverge: foreign prisoner numbers rose 20% since 2019 amid backlog surges.

Appeals delay justice. Hamid’s next hearing waits until 2026, freeing him in Britain meantime. Taxpayers fund his housing, legal aid, and prison stay—costs exceeding £50,000 per inmate yearly.

This exposes enforcement paralysis. Human rights frameworks, layered since 1998, shield offenders with tenuous claims. Officials issue orders but tribunals reverse them, eroding deterrence for imported crime.

Public safety bears the load. Hamid’s “ring and bring” operation supplied Class A drugs across West Yorkshire. Releasing such figures without borders intact heightens repeat risks.

Institutional capture sustains the cycle. Legal aid firms profit from appeals; judges uphold expansive rights interpretations. Politicians decry the system yet expand it, prioritizing international obligations over domestic security.

Reform UK’s Colin Sutton demands mass deportations. Data shows 70% public support for automatic removal post-conviction. Yet policy stalls, as foreign nationals commit 20% of sex offences and 15% of drug crimes.

Britain once repatriated offenders routinely. Pre-2000s, deportation success exceeded 80% for EU nationals. Now appeals consume years, prisons overflow, and communities absorb fallout.

Hamid’s reprieve crystallizes migration control’s collapse. Citizenship proves no safeguard against retention when language excuses suffice. This dysfunction spans parties, burdens citizens, and signals irreversible institutional decay.